ATEG Archives

April 2005

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marcia Alessi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:06:48 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
Johanna,
How do you recommend the study of new verbs?

Marcia Alessi


On Apr 26, 2005, at 3:00 PM, Johanna Rubba wrote:

> Cognitive views of language propose that all of our knowledge is 
> stored in units called schemas or frames. These are like screenplays 
> for typical events -- getting up in the morning, applying for a job, 
> going grocery shopping, attending a birthday party -- which allow us 
> to recognize an event and behave appropriately. Schema theory has 
> featured in studies of reading for some time now, because possessing 
> and pre-activating a schema related to the topic of the reading 
> ("anticipatory set") improves reading comprehension, and lacking a 
> schema impedes it significantly.
>
> Schemas are the knowledge bases within which the definitions of words 
> reside. "Sister" resides in a kinship schema; "candy" isn't just 
> anything sweet (fruit is not candy), but also involves notions like 
> "treat" (hence extensions to "eye candy" and "brain candy") and "not 
> meal food". "Pet" as a sort of animal depends on the notion of 
> domesticated animals that serve only as companions, which means they 
> have to contrast with beasts of burden and food -- competing animal 
> schemas.
>
> A few of you have mentioned putting words together that come from the 
> same domain of experience -- nautical words, etc. This exploits 
> schemas; it is easier for students to fit a new word into an existing 
> schema by relating it to other aspects of the domain.
>
> Early-grade materials often do this: words about the sea; words for 
> things in the kitchen, etc. For reasons I do not understand this does 
> not continue much in the higher grades. I've seen some lists of words 
> like "occupational" or "history" or "science", but a lot of the words 
> on the list are not exclusive to that domain. They're in the list 
> because they were in the reading.
>
> The other way humans organize their knowledge is in categories of like 
> things. My first exercise when I teach about vocabulary is to ask my 
> students to name 25 of the words they know that start with "m", _in 
> alphabetical order_. This is very hard, of course. We don't store 
> words in alphabetical order in our minds.
>
> Then I ask them to name ten kinds of fruit. The whole class starts 
> calling out and we have 15 fruit names in less than a minute. Once 
> again, teaching materials for young children often work with 
> categories (animals; plants; occupations), but again, this disappears 
> in the higher grades. Why? Using the natural ways the mind organizes 
> words facilitates vocabulary expansion.
>
> I advise my students (for when they become teachers) to work with 
> their kids to develop schema- and category-based "dictionaries". Each 
> time they get a list of new vocabulary words, they work on adding them 
> to these dictionaries. Word processing makes it very easy to adapt and 
> change such documents.
>
> The game "Outburst" works on these two principles. It's a game in 
> which teams have to guess ten words that are on a card that the 
> "emcee" holds. Each list is based on either a category (Clint Eastwood 
> movies, hobbies, populous cities, volcanoes of the world) or a schema 
> (things you find in a bathroom, things associated with San Francisco, 
> things you take to the beach, etc.). I also use this in class. It's 
> really excellent for ESL teaching. But having kids make up an Outburst 
> game derived from their "dictionaries" could be an entertaining way to 
> review vocabulary. Only words from their dictionary earn points, just 
> as in Outburst you get no credit for naming something that does not 
> appear on the card.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Johanna Rubba   Associate Professor, Linguistics
> English Department, California Polytechnic State University
> One Grand Avenue  • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
> Tel. (805)-756-2184  •  Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone.  756-2596
> • E-mail: [log in to unmask] •      Home page: 
> http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web 
> interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>
Marcia Alessi
Language Arts & Social Studies
Sixth Grade
St. Paul the Apostle School
Los Angeles, California

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2