Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 1997 15:37:53 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask]
to
> the ATEG list
>
> The following is a contribution to the discussion of the structure of
> "the she of England is unhappy."
>
> "As articles are by their nature definitives, it follows of course,
> that they cannot be united with such words as are in their own nature
> as definite as they may be; nor with such words which, being
> indefinite, cannot properly be made otherwise: but only with those
> words which, though indefinite, are yet capable, through the article,
> of becoming definite. Hence we see the reason why it is absurd to
> say "the I" or "the thou," because nothing can make these pronouns
> more definite than they are; and the same can be said of proper
> names." --"Of Universal Grammar." The Encyclopedia Britannica,
> 1771.
>
> Sincerely, Robert Einarsson
> please visit my web site at
> www.artsci.gmcc.ab.ca/people/einarssonb
>
>
|
|
|