ATEG Archives

October 2000

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Richard Veit, UNCW English Department" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:40:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Johanna:

English possessives are possessives of entire noun phrases, not just of 
nouns, and we add the apostrophe + s to the end of the phrase; for example, 
we say "the Queen of England's horses" rather than "the Queen's of England 
horses."  So it's brothers-in-law's.

Dick Veit



At 09:51 AM 10/25/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>One of my students stumped me in class yesterday. We were discussing
>apostrophe use, and she asked how one would punctuate the possessive
>plural of 'brother-in-law', assuming 'brother' carries the plural marker.
>
>Brothers'-in-law        looks terrible to me, but
>brothers-in-law's       looks no better.
>
>I think this example is a good argument for shifting the plural to
>'brother-in-laws' (I'm kidding, actually, 'brother-in-laws' sounds wrong
>to me).
>
>What do you all think?
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Johanna Rubba   Assistant Professor, Linguistics
>English Department, California Polytechnic State University
>One Grand Avenue  • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
>Tel. (805)-756-2184  •  Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone.  756-259
>• E-mail: [log in to unmask] •  Home page: http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2