Scott Woods wrote:
"The point being made was not that the possibility of Jesus having 
spoken English had a questionable factual basis, but that whether a 
Washington State legislator actually said he did has a questionable 
factual basis."


Well, this isn't the end of the world, but here is the original text:

"It may be that more than one writer or speaker actually says this, but 
it is still a contemporary legend and has questionable factual basis 
when reported second-hand."

The "this" of the first sentence refers to the legend about what Christ 
spoke; the second sentence has a compound predicate; "it" is subject of 
both predicates; "it" and "legend" co-refer. "It" is most naturally 
connected to "this". Whatever the writer meant, the meaning of the 
sentence as the grammar constructs it is that the legend has a 
questionable factual basis, not the reports of somebody saying it.
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba   Associate Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue  • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184  •  Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone.  756-2596
• E-mail: [log in to unmask] •      Home page: 
http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/