Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:24:15 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Return without delay to become who you truly are."
"Who" is the subject complement of the clause "you truly are (subj.
compl.) The conservative view is that this position requires subjective
case: "I am looking for an honest person, and you truly are she". Thus
the pronoun should be "who" acc. to traditional rules.
"Who" is also correct in the currently evolving new rules for
"who/whom", in which "whom" is ceasing to be used, is used rather
randomly because the user has not internalized the older rules, or is
used only in fixed expressions such as "to whom it may concern".
Just to demonstrate how confused current speakers of English are on the
"whom" question, here's a quote from a Ph.D. English lit. professor
writing in an administrative capacity: "the plan is
to have her serve in this capacity through the first year of the new
CLA dean's "reign," whomever that may be." "Should" be "whoever that may
be."
There is probably no way to resurrect "whom" at this point. It carries
no essential information; we should let it go. It will be fun convincing
standards authorities of that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Associate Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184 • Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone. 756-2596
• E-mail: [log in to unmask] • Home page:
http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|