CLEANACCESS Archives

April 2007

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Speight, Howard" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:53:17 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 kB) , Wireless.jpg (105 kB) , WLCam.jpg (112 kB) , ResHall.jpg (103 kB) , RHCam.jpg (108 kB)
I hope, nay, pray, I don't jinx it, but both our CAMS are fast and
idling.

Wireless:
4.0.4, around 1250 certified devices, between 660-800 active at any one
time. Dell PE650, 2.4GHz P4, 1.5GB memory, 40GB IDE. 2 CAM, 2 CAS in HA
mode.

Residence Hall:
4.0.4, around 4100 certified devices, between 3,200-3,800 active at any
one time. Dell PE750, 3GHz P4, 2GB memory, 36GB SCSI. 2 CAM, 6 CAS in HA
mode.

Upgraded over Christmas break from 3.5.10 to 4.0.4.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Zocher, Mark James
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 13:12
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Slow Login to Clean Access Manager

Welcome to the club!  We've been experiencing these problems for over
two months now. (Currently running 4.0.5.0)  Our CAM interface is so
slow it is unusable.  Getting a report on a user can take at least 5
minutes.  Users will often time out when they try to log in.  When we
run TOP, we see multiple postmaster processes as well. 

We opened a TAC ticket with Cisco, and their solution was to rebuild the
CAM.  We feel this is not a proper solution for a production machine,
but Cisco has provided no alternative.  We plan to rebuild in the
summer.

Our only workaround is to disable CCA Agent checks.  It kinda defeats
the point of having CCA, but at least users can log in.

~Mark Zocher
Helpdesk Tech Coordinator 
ITS Student Computing Services
Washington State University - Pullman, WA

-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon Bell
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 8:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Slow Login to Clean Access Manager

So your CAM web interface is slow too? I noticed it after the 4.x
upgrade but just thought it was cuz I only have 1gb of ram. Running
reports is frustratingly slow, I get grief from the HD trying to track
users down more and more.

-s

>>> 
From: 	"King, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Date: 	4/23/2007 11:40 AM
Subject: 	Re: Slow Login to Clean Access Manager

As things always are,

A few minutes after I posted this, things seemed to have cleared....

Interface is back to its normal sluggish self.  (approx 10 -30 seconds
to login)

I have scheduled a restart of the CAM for our next service window this
Friday.

But it was weird man.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon Bell
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: Slow Login to Clean Access Manager

I've noticed my CAM web interface is slow, but not as slow as you've
described, but I attribute the slowness to only having a 1gb of ram on
the CAM. While I have just as many postgres process running, they're not
eating CPU like yours appear to be. service perfigo restart?

Simon

>>> 
From: 	"King, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Date: 	4/23/2007 11:21 AM
Subject: 	Re: Slow Login to Clean Access Manager

Stats seem a little strange as well....


top - 11:17:35 up 51 days, 13:40,  1 user,  load average: 29.51, 50.46,
31.79
Tasks: 118 total,   9 running, 108 sleeping,   0 stopped,   1 zombie
Cpu(s): 51.3% us, 48.4% sy,  0.0% ni,  0.0% id,  0.0% wa,  0.3% hi,
0.0% si
Mem:   2076300k total,  1928188k used,   148112k free,    35588k buffers
Swap:  2040244k total,     2836k used,  2037408k free,  1451272k cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
28847 postgres  15   0 21352  13m  11m S 10.2  0.6  62:07.03 postmaster
10130 postgres  17   0 21672  13m  11m R  7.6  0.7 153:52.81 postmaster
28947 postgres  16   0 22248  13m  11m S  7.6  0.7  11:26.70 postmaster
28848 postgres  17   0 21408  13m  11m R  7.0  0.6  14:59.66 postmaster
27724 postgres  17   0 21500  13m  11m R  6.7  0.6 112:42.37 postmaster
28843 postgres  16   0 22424  13m  11m S  6.7  0.7  41:18.10 postmaster
28903 postgres  16   0 21368  13m  11m R  6.7  0.6  27:49.15 postmaster
10117 postgres  16   0 21620  13m  11m S  4.9  0.6  62:26.22 postmaster
10792 postgres  16   0 22276  13m  11m S  4.9  0.7  68:25.50 postmaster
10127 postgres  16   0 21380  13m  11m S  4.4  0.7 200:09.67 postmaster
10116 postgres  16   0 21336  13m  11m S  3.5  0.6 113:33.10 postmaster
10794 postgres  16   0 20820  12m  11m S  2.9  0.6  32:32.31 postmaster
28851 postgres  16   0 21336  13m  11m S  2.9  0.6  55:19.42 postmaster
28941 postgres  16   0 20824  12m  11m S  2.9  0.6  41:48.62 postmaster
10122 postgres  16   0 21332  13m  11m S  2.6  0.6  73:39.26 postmaster
10000 root      25   0 1225m 162m  14m S  2.3  8.0 366:51.50 java
10115 postgres  15   0 22260  13m  11m S  2.0  0.7  66:15.41 postmaster
10120 postgres  15   0 21368  13m  11m S  2.0  0.6  65:15.27 postmaster
27723 postgres  15   0 21344  13m  11m S  2.0  0.6  48:26.44 postmaster
27770 postgres  15   0 21336  13m  11m S  1.7  0.6  61:48.02 postmaster
10124 postgres  16   0 21336  13m  11m R  1.5  0.6  29:06.43 postmaster
10126 postgres  16   0 21336  13m  11m R  0.9  0.6  59:33.85 postmaster
31406 postgres  15   0 21376  13m  11m S  0.9  0.7 108:23.24 postmaster
10795 postgres  16   0 21460  13m  11m S  0.9  0.7  92:15.34 postmaster
28942 postgres  15   0 21356  13m  11m S  0.9  0.7  77:30.80 postmaster
10129 postgres  15   0 21332  13m  11m S  0.6  0.6 130:57.62 postmaster
31396 postgres  15   0 21332  13m  11m S  0.6  0.6 137:11.30 postmaster
10793 postgres  16   0 21336  13m  11m S  0.6  0.6  68:09.16 postmaster
28850 postgres  16   0 21364  12m  11m S  0.6  0.6  28:31.00 postmaster
10118 postgres  16   0 21312  13m  11m S  0.3  0.6 113:45.38 postmaster
10125 postgres  16   0 21568  13m  11m R  0.3  0.7 206:28.32 postmaster
31407 postgres  15   0 21332  12m  11m S  0.3  0.6  81:47.22 postmaster
10791 postgres  15   0 21348  13m  11m S  0.3  0.6  43:50.74 postmaster
28853 postgres  16   0 21320  13m  11m S  0.3  0.6  38:50.62 postmaster
28946 postgres  16   0 21484  13m  11m S  0.3  0.6  76:49.36 postmaster
    1 root      16   0  1680  552  472 S  0.0  0.0   0:01.24 init
    2 root      34  19     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0


ATOM RSS1 RSS2