Awesome! Thanks for the info guys!
--Jeremy
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:12, Alok Agrawal
(alagrawa)<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hey Curt,
> Its out. The new agent with 4.6 has a service component to it and hence will not need the stub agent anymore.
>
> Regards
> -Alok
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Curt McDaniel
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NAC3350
>
> Will that still have a Stub Installer requirement for computers without admin rights or is that finally out?
>
> Curt McDaniel Washington State Patrol
>
>
> Curt McDaniel
> Network Security
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Mon Jun 29 20:55:29 2009
> Subject: Re: NAC3350
>
> Hey Jeremy,
> We're planning on releasing 4.6 the week of July 7th.
>
> Thanks
> -Alok
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Wood
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NAC3350
>
> Word on the street was 4.6 was coming out soon. I'm not sure if anyone
> from Cisco can give us a timeline but maybe that would help you out.
>
> No one else has brought it up....but you could provide the 4.1.10
> client to your users that need it and still use 4.5 on the appliances.
> That is unless it's what you run on the majority of you're machine and
> in that case that might be a PITA. When it comes to picking versions I
> like look at the features of the versions I'm choosing between. If 4.5
> offers something you need then maybe working out the SAV issue is
> something worth looking into.
>
> The 4.1.x series is also EOL as of July 15, 2010 and after that only
> the 4.5 version or greater are going to be supported on the
> appliances.
>
> --Jeremy
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 17:48, Pastor, Richard<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Ken,
>>
>>
>>
>> I would only suggest you to stay away from 4.5.0.0. It not only has the
>> problems with Norton, but also with Vista in combination with any Symantec
>> AV product. Thanks for the info on 4.1.10.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard Pastor
>>
>> Information Technology Services
>>
>> The John Marshall Law School
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
>> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:37 PM
>>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: NAC3350
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Richard:
>>
>>
>>
>> The release notes for 4.1.10 agent have some newer AV versions than 4.5.1
>> and Cisco removed some AV versions from 4.5.1
>>
>> Doug Chudzik posted this info about Norton 16.5 not working with 4.1.8 agent
>> and others also complained about Norton 16, so I assume there is a problem
>> with 4.5.1. We also need free AVG 8.5 detection as well, ok with 4.1.10
>> (posted by Isabelle Graham) not with 4.5.1.
>>
>>
>>
>> I would like to know what version (4.1.8 or 4.5.1) other NAC administrators
>> are using for comparison.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Someone from Cisco emailed me and I tested the trial version of Norton
>>> Internet Security 2009 (16.5) here, and it does indeed >work with the 4.1.10
>>> Agent. It failed in the 4.1.8 Agent.
>>
>>>
>>
>>>On Symantec's website they want you to give a credit card to download the
>>> trial, but I found a copy on Softpedia that doesn't >require any info since
>>> they have it mirrored:
>>> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Firewall/Norton-Internet-Security.shtml
>>
>>>
>>
>>>Doug Chudzik
>>
>>>ResNet Manager
>>
>>>Wellesley College
>>
>>
>>
>>>====
>>
>>>I've just started testing with the 4.1.10 agent and it looks like it
>>> supports AVG 8.5 free at least.
>>
>>>I don't have a copy of NIS 2009 to test with unfortunately.
>>
>>>
>>
>>>----
>>
>>>Isabelle Graham
>>
>>>Information Security
>>
>>>American University
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *****************************************
>> Ken Webber Ph. 902-494-2217
>> Networks and Systems
>> Dalhousie University
>> Halifax, N.S, Canada
>> E-mail [log in to unmask]
>> *****************************************
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pastor, Richard
>> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 3:16 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: NAC3350
>>
>>
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>> We have 4.1.8/4.5, and definitely have the problems you describe. Last
>> Wednesday, I submitted my whines to the group, but haven't received any
>> replies to this point. Do you have reason to believe that agent 4.1.10.0
>> would be better?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard Pastor
>>
>> Information Technology Services
>>
>> The John Marshall Law School
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
>> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:34 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: NAC3350
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello all:
>>
>>
>>
>> We have just required two NAC3350 servers and I am tying to decide to use
>> 4.1.8 with agent 4.1.10.0 or 4.5.1. 4.5.1 appears scary with its AVG and
>> Norton detection problems and some open caveats. Any feedback would be
>> helpful.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Ken
>>
>>
>>
>> *****************************************
>> Ken Webber Ph. 902-494-2217
>> Networks and Systems
>> Dalhousie University
>> Halifax, N.S, Canada
>> E-mail [log in to unmask]
>> *****************************************
>>
>>
>
|
