CLEANACCESS Archives

September 2005

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"King, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:03:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
 Cisco/Perfigo has been quite clear all along.  The manager and the
server MUST be on the same version.

The client is a different matter, and has backwards and forwards
support.

Note, I have no idea what the change on 3.5.5 on the client and the
server have on the backwards compatibility, since they changed the
communication protocol. The rest of my statement is conjecture.  I would
imagine they would support older clients, with the idea of forcing them
to upgrade to the new client.

I'm running 3.5.4 on the CAS and CAM, and 3.5.6 on the clients. (All of
my clients, I made them all upgrade)  Unless the wheels fall off, we
plan on running this way till December.  (No changes during the school
year, if we can help it)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lanstein, Alex C
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:50 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 3.5.4 - Word to the wise
> 
> Word to the wise:
>  
> Although some of the versions are definately compatable, the 
> following are not!
> 3.5.4 on the manager.
> 3.5.6 on the server
> 3.5.4 (or 6) on the client
>  
> Moved everything to 3.5.5 and all is well in the CCA world.
>  
> Regards,
> Alex Lanstein
>  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2