CLEANACCESS Archives

February 2009

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Field Notice 63204 - CA w/Symantec
From:
"Grzeczka, Timothy J." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:11:58 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines) 
We have found a few cases where we need to have the user running the
4.5.0.0 agent for the latest AVG or SEP updates to be detected properly.

4.1.3.1 CAM
4.5.0.0 Agent



Timothy Grzeczka
Network Analyst , Dominican University
[log in to unmask]
W: (708) 524-6568
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/3/a5b/706

-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Isabelle Graham
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Field Notice 63204 - CA w/Symantec

We haven't done a large scale deployment here but it's been working fine
in our smaller test groups.

CAM 4.1.2.1
Agent 4.1.3.2

----
Isabelle Graham
Information Security
American University

Don Click wrote:
> Has anyone had any problems with this using Symantec Endpoint
protection v11.0?  Only a few of my users have vista (including me) and
I haven't heard of anything.
> 
> Just wanted to get your feedback.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Don Click
> Telecommunications Manager
> Department of Information Services
> Denton County
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2