Hi Curt,
4.6.1 will not require a stub installer for Admin users. Single agent install.
Thanks,
Prem
-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Curt McDaniel
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NAC3350
Will that still have a Stub Installer requirement for computers without admin rights or is that finally out?
Curt McDaniel Washington State Patrol
Curt McDaniel
Network Security
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
----- Original Message -----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mon Jun 29 20:55:29 2009
Subject: Re: NAC3350
Hey Jeremy,
We're planning on releasing 4.6 the week of July 7th.
Thanks
-Alok
-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Wood
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NAC3350
Word on the street was 4.6 was coming out soon. I'm not sure if anyone
from Cisco can give us a timeline but maybe that would help you out.
No one else has brought it up....but you could provide the 4.1.10
client to your users that need it and still use 4.5 on the appliances.
That is unless it's what you run on the majority of you're machine and
in that case that might be a PITA. When it comes to picking versions I
like look at the features of the versions I'm choosing between. If 4.5
offers something you need then maybe working out the SAV issue is
something worth looking into.
The 4.1.x series is also EOL as of July 15, 2010 and after that only
the 4.5 version or greater are going to be supported on the
appliances.
--Jeremy
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 17:48, Pastor, Richard<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ken,
>
>
>
> I would only suggest you to stay away from 4.5.0.0. It not only has the
> problems with Norton, but also with Vista in combination with any Symantec
> AV product. Thanks for the info on 4.1.10.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard Pastor
>
> Information Technology Services
>
> The John Marshall Law School
>
>
>
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:37 PM
>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NAC3350
>
>
>
> Hi Richard:
>
>
>
> The release notes for 4.1.10 agent have some newer AV versions than 4.5.1
> and Cisco removed some AV versions from 4.5.1
>
> Doug Chudzik posted this info about Norton 16.5 not working with 4.1.8 agent
> and others also complained about Norton 16, so I assume there is a problem
> with 4.5.1. We also need free AVG 8.5 detection as well, ok with 4.1.10
> (posted by Isabelle Graham) not with 4.5.1.
>
>
>
> I would like to know what version (4.1.8 or 4.5.1) other NAC administrators
> are using for comparison.
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
>
>
>>Someone from Cisco emailed me and I tested the trial version of Norton
>> Internet Security 2009 (16.5) here, and it does indeed >work with the 4.1.10
>> Agent. It failed in the 4.1.8 Agent.
>
>>
>
>>On Symantec's website they want you to give a credit card to download the
>> trial, but I found a copy on Softpedia that doesn't >require any info since
>> they have it mirrored:
>> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Firewall/Norton-Internet-Security.shtml
>
>>
>
>>Doug Chudzik
>
>>ResNet Manager
>
>>Wellesley College
>
>
>
>>====
>
>>I've just started testing with the 4.1.10 agent and it looks like it
>> supports AVG 8.5 free at least.
>
>>I don't have a copy of NIS 2009 to test with unfortunately.
>
>>
>
>>----
>
>>Isabelle Graham
>
>>Information Security
>
>>American University
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *****************************************
> Ken Webber Ph. 902-494-2217
> Networks and Systems
> Dalhousie University
> Halifax, N.S, Canada
> E-mail [log in to unmask]
> *****************************************
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pastor, Richard
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 3:16 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NAC3350
>
>
>
> Ken,
>
> We have 4.1.8/4.5, and definitely have the problems you describe. Last
> Wednesday, I submitted my whines to the group, but haven't received any
> replies to this point. Do you have reason to believe that agent 4.1.10.0
> would be better?
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard Pastor
>
> Information Technology Services
>
> The John Marshall Law School
>
>
>
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:34 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: NAC3350
>
>
>
> Hello all:
>
>
>
> We have just required two NAC3350 servers and I am tying to decide to use
> 4.1.8 with agent 4.1.10.0 or 4.5.1. 4.5.1 appears scary with its AVG and
> Norton detection problems and some open caveats. Any feedback would be
> helpful.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Ken
>
>
>
> *****************************************
> Ken Webber Ph. 902-494-2217
> Networks and Systems
> Dalhousie University
> Halifax, N.S, Canada
> E-mail [log in to unmask]
> *****************************************
>
>
|
