CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2008

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nathaniel Austin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:58:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Hey Dennis,

I would check to see if English/US would work - just to verify that is 
the problem.

Yes the CAM can check on version. Under your requirement rules you have 
the option that is highlighted yellow that says allow definition files 
to be X days older than. If you uncheck that box it will do version 
instead of date checks.

Nate

Dennis Xu wrote:
> I was thinking about regional format as well. One user has regional format English/Canada and the other user has regional format English/UK. The date format for both regions are DDMMYYYY. I believe if they set the format to English/US that will work. But I believe all the users laptops here are default to English/Canada. That is a big problem. Can CAM checks for definition version, not date?   
>
> Dennis 
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nathaniel Austin" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2008 9:28:31 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: 4.1.7 agent
>
> Hey Dennis,
>
> May be a problem with the date format - in the CAM it shows the date as 
> "10/07/2008" but it looks like the agent reported "07/10/2008" from its 
> API call to the McAfee product - What date format is the client set to 
> in the Windows settings?
>
> Nate
>
> Dennis Xu wrote:
>   
>> I have seen two cases that 4.1.7 failed to recognize McAfee 13 virus definition. For ex, the following user failed virus definition check:
>>
>> Client AV Info
>>  
>> Product ID: McAfeeAV 
>> Product Name: McAfee VirusScan 
>> Product Version: 13.0.218 
>> Virus Definition File Version: 5400 
>> Virus Definition File Date: 07/10/2008 
>>
>> Anyone knows if it is a known bug?
>>
>> Dennis 
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Don Click" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2008 9:39:24 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: 4.1.7 agent
>>
>> Yes, our system is setup to auto push the new agent. I do have a few people using it, but haven't tested it myself.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kyle Torkelson
>> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:06 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: 4.1.7 agent
>>
>> Has anyone been pushing out the 4.1.7 agent??  I saw it posted on
>> Cisco's software downloads section giving the following fixes:
>>
>> CSCsr75771      Support for Symantec Corp 10.1.5.500
>> CSCsr87134      Vista wired/wifi MAC address fix
>> CSCsr97355      Support for AVG 8
>>
>> Can anyone also address if 4.1.7 is going to be an agent fix only and no
>> CAM/CAS release???
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kyle Torkelson
>> Senior Network Administrator
>> University of Sioux Falls
>>   
>>     

ATOM RSS1 RSS2