CLEANACCESS Archives

June 2009

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ken Webber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:57:26 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (280 lines)
I also thank you all for the info. Jeremy, I will be upgrading to 4.6 next
May anyway. By then 4.6 should be more stable.

Ken

> The 4.1.x series is also EOL as of July 15, 2010 and after that only 
> the 4.5 version or greater are going to be supported on the 
> appliances.
>
> --Jeremy

*****************************************
    Ken Webber        Ph. 902-494-2217
    Networks and Systems
    Dalhousie University
    Halifax, N.S, Canada
    E-mail [log in to unmask]
*****************************************
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Wood
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:57 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NAC3350
> 
> Awesome! Thanks for the info guys!
> 
> --Jeremy
> 
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:12, Alok Agrawal
> (alagrawa)<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Hey Curt,
> > Its out. The new agent with 4.6 has a service component to it and hence
> will not need the stub agent anymore.
> >
> > Regards
> > -Alok
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Curt McDaniel
> > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:12 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: NAC3350
> >
> > Will that still have a Stub Installer requirement for computers without
> admin rights or is that finally out?
> >
> > Curt McDaniel Washington State Patrol
> >
> >
> > Curt McDaniel
> > Network Security
> > --------------------------
> > Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Mon Jun 29 20:55:29 2009
> > Subject: Re: NAC3350
> >
> > Hey Jeremy,
> > We're planning on releasing 4.6 the week of July 7th.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Alok
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Wood
> > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:12 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: NAC3350
> >
> > Word on the street was 4.6 was coming out soon. I'm not sure if anyone
> > from Cisco can give us a timeline but maybe that would help you out.
> >
> > No one else has brought it up....but you could provide the 4.1.10
> > client to your users that need it and still use 4.5 on the appliances.
> > That is unless it's what you run on the majority of you're machine and
> > in that case that might be a PITA. When it comes to picking versions I
> > like look at the features of the versions I'm choosing between. If 4.5
> > offers something you need then maybe working out the SAV issue is
> > something worth looking into.
> >
> > The 4.1.x series is also EOL as of July 15, 2010 and after that only
> > the 4.5 version or greater are going to be supported on the
> > appliances.
> >
> > --Jeremy
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 17:48, Pastor, Richard<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >> Ken,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I would only suggest you to stay away from 4.5.0.0.  It not only has
> the
> >> problems with Norton, but also with Vista in combination with any
> Symantec
> >> AV product.  Thanks for the info on 4.1.10.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Richard Pastor
> >>
> >> Information Technology Services
> >>
> >> The John Marshall Law School
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
> >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:37 PM
> >>
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: Re: NAC3350
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Richard:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The release notes for 4.1.10 agent have some newer AV versions than
> 4.5.1
> >> and Cisco removed some AV versions from 4.5.1
> >>
> >> Doug Chudzik posted this info about Norton 16.5 not working with 4.1.8
> agent
> >> and others also complained about Norton 16, so I assume there is a
> problem
> >> with 4.5.1. We also need free AVG 8.5 detection as well, ok with 4.1.10
> >> (posted by Isabelle Graham) not with 4.5.1.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I would like to know what version (4.1.8 or 4.5.1) other NAC
> administrators
> >> are using for comparison.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ken
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Someone from Cisco emailed me and I tested the trial version of Norton
> >>> Internet Security 2009 (16.5) here, and it does indeed >work with the
> 4.1.10
> >>> Agent. It failed in the 4.1.8 Agent.
> >>
> >>>
> >>
> >>>On Symantec's website they want you to give a credit card to download
> the
> >>> trial, but I found a copy on Softpedia that doesn't >require any info
> since
> >>> they have it mirrored:
> >>> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Firewall/Norton-Internet-
> Security.shtml
> >>
> >>>
> >>
> >>>Doug Chudzik
> >>
> >>>ResNet Manager
> >>
> >>>Wellesley College
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>====
> >>
> >>>I've just started testing with the 4.1.10 agent and it looks like it
> >>> supports AVG 8.5 free at least.
> >>
> >>>I don't have a copy of NIS 2009 to test with unfortunately.
> >>
> >>>
> >>
> >>>----
> >>
> >>>Isabelle Graham
> >>
> >>>Information Security
> >>
> >>>American University
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *****************************************
> >>     Ken Webber        Ph. 902-494-2217
> >>     Networks and Systems
> >>     Dalhousie University
> >>     Halifax, N.S, Canada
> >>     E-mail [log in to unmask]
> >> *****************************************
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >>
> >> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pastor, Richard
> >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 3:16 PM
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: Re: NAC3350
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ken,
> >>
> >> We have 4.1.8/4.5, and definitely have the problems you describe.
>  Last
> >> Wednesday, I submitted my whines to the group, but haven't received any
> >> replies to this point.  Do you have reason to believe that agent
> 4.1.10.0
> >> would be better?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Richard Pastor
> >>
> >> Information Technology Services
> >>
> >> The John Marshall Law School
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> >> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
> >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:34 AM
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: NAC3350
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello all:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We have just required two NAC3350 servers and I am tying to decide to
> use
> >> 4.1.8 with agent 4.1.10.0 or 4.5.1. 4.5.1 appears scary with its AVG
> and
> >> Norton detection problems and some open caveats. Any feedback would be
> >> helpful.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks, Ken
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *****************************************
> >>     Ken Webber        Ph. 902-494-2217
> >>     Networks and Systems
> >>     Dalhousie University
> >>     Halifax, N.S, Canada
> >>     E-mail [log in to unmask]
> >> *****************************************
> >>
> >>
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2