CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2005

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"King, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:35:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wilson, Julie

> How did your network handle the 9 Microsoft updates that were 
> just out?


We haven't required them.  We copy the Cisco Rules, and use the copy.
We'll Goto the 9 new patches next week, unless we feel we need to move
faster (This has happened before).  The plan is that AutoUpdates (which
we require) will have 80  to 90% of them updated by the time it becomes
a requirement the following Tuesday.

The only rules that we allow to automatically update are the AV rules.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2