Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:35:46 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What makes you think this is a Cisco problem?
Cisco isn't trashing all of these DLLs and stuff...
Cheers,
Rand
Please STARTsafe and RUNsafe -- www.merrimack.edu/runsafe
--
Rand P. Hall * Director, Network Services / Merrimack College * SunGard
* Collegis
315 Turnpike Street, North Andover MA 01845 * Tel 978-837-5000 * Fax
978-837-5434
[log in to unmask] * www.sungardcollegis.com
CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
-----Original Message-----
From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Greg Schaffer
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 2:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Microsoft and Cisco
First of all, I am quite glad I stumbled upon this list! We implemented
CCA this past summer and have seen many of the issues being discussed on
this list.
In reference to a thread from last month, we also had instances related
to the "902400" Windows Update headache. I opened a call with Cisco on
Oct 14th requesting assistance and have essentially gotten no useful
information, just "CCA supports this update". I thought we were alone
in experiencing the problem of some users going to Microsoft's update
site and running the update tool, reporting everything clean, whereas
CCA denied access because 902400 was not installed. In the end, I have
turned off all Windows update checks excpet for the one to check to see
if auto update is running.
This has created yet another PR black eye for CCA and honestly I'm about
ready to reevaluate our CCA stance as well. It's been a couple of
weeks, and I'm just curious what anyone else has done related to this
issue if they had the same problem(s). I considered sending the users
to a page to manually install this and other updates, but quite frankly
I don't want to add that extra cumbersome layer to the residents whom
are already not pleased with CCA's performance. I'm also very
disappointed with Cisco's TAC on this. I understand it may be
ultimately a Microsoft issue but on the other hand CCA should be able to
work around it.
Thanks,
Greg Schaffer
Director of Network Services
Middle Tennessee State University
|
|
|