Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:20:31 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>For what it's worth we have run 800-1000 users through a single IB CAS
>with no noticeable issues. And that's on five-year old HP DL120s. About
>3400 users overall on a single CAM.
Cal,
Thanks for the information. Another reason I want to keep it out of band is because if the device fails, we would be dead in the water right? Or does it matter? My understanding is if an OOB CAS fails users can still logon the network if you want to design it that way of course. Please let me know if I am wrong.
I appreciate any advice. The more, the better I can make decisions.
Pete
Hey my sister graduated from Oberlin two years ago and loved it! Sounds like a great school.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cal Frye
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Advice on deployment needed
Pete Boynton wrote:
>>> Is there a reason you want to go OOB...???
>
> Right now I guess we want to do that because of scaling. We are a
> fast growing company and by keeping the traffic out of band we won't
> overwhelm the CAM.
For what it's worth we have run 800-1000 users through a single IB CAS
with no noticeable issues. And that's on five-year old HP DL120s. About
3400 users overall on a single CAM.
--
Celebrating the 150th anniversary of the publication of the Origin of
Species.
-- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
Mudd Library, x.56930 -- CIT will NEVER ask you for your password!
www.calfrye.com, www.pitalabs.com
"Beer ... a high and mighty liquor." --- Julius Caesar.
|
|
|