You have to use the "New AV Rule" button in order to get the >=  
operator.  It's implied by virtue of it being an AV rule.  I was  
disappointed that they didn't go ahead and give us that operator in  
general, particularly because that was what the Cisco techs told us  
they were doing, but the new AV rules seem to work fine(If Cisco  
supports the AV client).

Michael Grinnell
Network Security Administrator
The American University
e-mail: [log in to unmask]

On Jul 18, 2005, at 3:01 PM, L Garner wrote:

> Folks,
>
> How do you set the AVChecks to >=?  Looking at the checks, I have  
> these options: equals, equals (ignore case), does not equal, starts  
> with, does not start with, ends withs, does not end with, contains,  
> and does not contain.
>
> And which pc_checks are you using?
>
> Thank you.
>
> -- 
> Libby Garner
> Library and Information Services
> 203 Chalmers Library
> Kenyon College
> [log in to unmask]
> 740-427-5699
>
> Simon Bell wrote:
>
>> Yea we've had that problem. We set the check to every hour and use  
>> the AV rules in conjunction with the pc_ checks. The AV checks are  
>> >=.
>> Simon L. Bell
>> Network Support Specialist
>> Georgia Southern University
>> e: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>>>> [log in to unmask] 7/18/2005 1:10 PM >>>
>>>>>
>> Does anyone else check if AV dat files are up to date?  If so is  
>> anyone
>> having a problem with students getting dat files are newer then  
>> what clean
>> access is checking for and therefore not passing?
>>   Text Box: Chris Toth
>> Senior Network Technician
>> Information Technology Services
>> Bowling Green State University
>> E-Mail: [log in to unmask] Phone: (419) 372-8462
>> Cell: (419) 409-0037
>>
>