CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2008

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Symantec End Point Protection v11
From:
"Hennessey, Sean" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:01:19 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
I get that, I was just wondering which rule/req was supposed to be used
to check for it in the first place. I suppose I'm directing this to the
person it is working for... :) Sorry. Is the generic SAVCE rule the one
that is supposed to find it?

- Sean

----

Sean Hennessey

Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator

The University of Portland


-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:50 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Symantec End Point Protection v11

Its the agent actually not detecting it properly, so the rule/req 
wouldn't matter (in this specific instance).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2