CLEANACCESS Archives

July 2005

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
nick pistentis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:47:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
As far as Windows support is concerned... MS is phasing out full support 
of 2000- security updates will still be available for the next few 
years, but no feature/driver updates will be available without paying 
for what they call "Extended Support." As for blocking a specific OS, I 
know that you can create a bogus registry key requirement for an 
operating system you want to restrict- that way, no matter how many 
times a computer is updated it can never fulfill that requirement.

-Nick
________________________________________________
Nicholas Pistentis
ResNet Systems Specialist
George Washington University
[log in to unmask]
202.994.6202

L Garner wrote:
> We're attempting to phase out older OS versions because Microsoft is not 
> supporting them.  I _think_ Microsoft currently still supports 2000, and 
>  of course XP support is still available.  My school will have to decide 
> if we will allow ME and older systems.... Do we 'ignore' if someone 
> brings a system using ME (telling them we don't support it if they have 
> a question)... Do we block these systems since we told them that ME 
> would not be supported after August 1st?
> 
> I decided to email the experts to see if it was even do-able, cause if 
> we could _not_ block, there was no reason to even discuss it.
> 
> You guys are GREAT!!!!!
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2