CLEANACCESS Archives

December 2009

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NAC 4.7.1 Upgrade - High CPU on CAS
From:
Kyle Torkelson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:24:56 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
Mike
  We are exact same as you...Virtual Gateway In Band on two 3140's.  Whether I have 0, 50 or 200 users online, kclick is always using 95-99%.  TAC told me it was nothing out of the ordinary...

I'm still skeptical though...

Kyle Torkelson
University of Sioux Falls




-----Original Message-----
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 10:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: NAC 4.7.1 Upgrade - High CPU on CAS

Just upgraded my test NAC system (1x3140 CAM, 1x3140 CAS) from 4.6.1 to 
4.7.1. The "kclick" process on the CAS is taking 99% of my CPU, and there 
is nobody on the system! I recall someone else posting with this same 
issue. I'm in Virtual Gateway Inband mode. Did anyone find a cause?



-Mike
             _________________________________________

Mike Diggins       			Voice:  905.525.9140 Ext. 27471
Network Analyst, Enterprise Networks    FAX:    905.522.0511
University Technology Services 		E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario

ATOM RSS1 RSS2