CLEANACCESS Archives

September 2005

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Cisco rules vs local rules
From:
"King, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:57:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
-----Original Message-----
From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pender, Anne
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Cisco rules vs local rules
I've seen it cheerfully report "up to date" with a months-old DAT and no
network connection at all - just because you can't find any information
one way or the other doesn't mean you should assume you're updated,
silly program!  



Just to chime in on this.....

I've seen McAffee cheerfully report "up to date" when the suscription is
expired.  (This is ignoring the subscription expired notice upon bootup)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2