CLEANACCESS Archives

July 2005

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Black <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:34:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hello all,

We are also now up to 3.5.2.1 are just beginning to explore the new AV
functionality.

We are expecting to find problems with our quarantine role allowing access
to updates all the various, supported a-v products. We're planning to stick
with 3: McAfee, Symmantic, Trendmicro for the time being and test them 1 by
1.

More to come as we understand it better ourselves.

-Bob Black
Miami University

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Aaron Havens
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 9:34 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: What version are you running?
> 
> I was wanting to take a short little poll of what version of 
> the Clean Access server people were running. We implemented 
> Clean Access a couple months ago with version 3.4. Now I see 
> that there is a version 3.5. We allow students here to run 
> any Cisco recognized anti-virus. This creates a problem at 
> times as students are running many version that are not 
> supported in 3.4 but are in 3.5. Is anyone out there running 
> 3.5 in production? If so what are your experiences?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Aaron Havens
> Network Technician
> Computing and Telecommunications
> Northeastern State University
> 610 N. Grand
> Suite 318
> Tahlequah, OK 74464
> http://netnotes.nsuok.edu/~havensa/
> 918-456-5511 Ext. 5813

ATOM RSS1 RSS2