Unless I don't understand how the rule functions, it seems to me that
there's a logic error in the pr_ rule.

The rule doesn't take into account that if a user has upgraded, the the
flash.ocx file is still in the path specified, and that the registry key
won't be there. The pr check needs one more "or" statement looking for
the new version.

I posted more info yesterday under "new flash checks".

Simon

>>> On 5/19/2006 at 1:51 PM, in message
<[log in to unmask]>,
"Rajesh
Nair (rajnair)" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Chuck,
>  
> Can you send the full report for this requirement (showing passed,
> failed and not executed checks)?
> Thanks,
> Rajesh.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of THETFORD, CHARLES
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:13 AM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: HELP WITH FAILED CHECK
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 	*	Failed Checks:
> 		pc_Flash_6_0_79, File Check
> [$SYSTEM_32\Macromed\Flash\Flash.ocx same as 6.0.79] 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Does anyone know what to do about this failed CCA check?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
> Chuck Thetford
> 
> Texas Woman's University
> 
>