Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:51:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Just to clarify, are Cisco's preconfigured rules now correctly checking
patch levels for both XP SP3 and Vista SP1? I still have my work around
in place. If true, are there any minimum software version requirements for
the servers or agent? I'm running 4.1.2.0.
-Mike
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) wrote:
> On recent Clean Access, the preconfigured rules already support SP3
> patches. Am I misunderstanding the question?
>
>
>
> Bruce Osborne
>
> Liberty University
>
>
>
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Sean
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:29 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [CLEANACCESS] XP SP3 question again
>
>
>
> Hi all -
>
>
>
> I'm setting up the rules to support SP3 on our network and I'm managing
> to confuse myself. Do I remove the SP2 rule entirely? If I do and make
> SP3 optional (to start with) will that allow users with neither onto my
> network? If anyone has tips on how they deployed this, I'd appreciate
> the sharing of them.
>
>
>
> I know this is a rather elementary question but I spend so much time on
> the other side of NAC that I've managed to completely forget most of the
> rule parameters...
>
>
>
> - Sean
>
>
>
> ----
>
> Sean Hennessey
>
> Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator
>
> The University of Portland
>
>
_________________________________________
Mike Diggins Voice: 905.525.9140 Ext. 27471
Network Analyst, Enterprise Networks FAX: 905.528.3773
University Technology Services E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
|
|
|