CLEANACCESS Archives

February 2007

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"King, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:03:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
Hi Dennis,

The pr_ checks don't support that functionality.

You have to use the AV_Rule Checks.  These then add that functionality.
You can check via the definition date, or revision version.

The pr_ are really for backwards compatibility, you should really be
using the AVRules instead.

Mike 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dennis Xu
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 12:51 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: CCA AV Virus Definition rules question
> 
> Thanks Nick!
> 
> Anyone tried with pre-configured McAfee AV update rule? I 
> tried with the rule pr_McAfee_Update, and the "allow X days 
> older" option does not work. Is it because this rule checks 
> the definition version, not the date? We are using v4.0.5.
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> 
> Dennis Xu
> Network Analyst (CCS)
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x 56217
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Pistentis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 12:35 PM
> To: Dennis Xu
> Subject: Re: CCA AV Virus Definition rules question
> 
> Hi Dennis-
> 
> We're using v3.6.4.2. There is an option for the 
> pre-configured Symantec update rule (I dunno if it extends to 
> all other AV vendors or just the
> biggies) to allow a grace period. We have set ours to 10 days 
> from current system date, which has had a measurable 
> (favorable) impact on the number of calls we get each week 
> regarding Symantec updates. I don't remember when exactly the 
> feature was added, but I *think* it was in the
> 3.6.4 or 3.6.2 release.
> 
> Good luck,
> 
> Nick
> _____________________________________
> Nicholas Pistentis
> Manager, Student Technology Services
> George Washington University
> [log in to unmask]
> 202.994.6202
> http://iss.gwu.edu/sts
> 
> Dennis Xu wrote:
> > Could you share some experiences about how to define AV Virus 
> > Definition rules to allow X days older than lastes file 
> date? Do you 
> > need customerize the checks and how do you automatically change the 
> > date in the check? It seems like the preconfigured rules 
> which check 
> > the AV definition version do not work for this.
> >  
> > Dennis Xu
> > Network Analyst (CCS)
> > University of Guelph
> > 519-824-4120 x 56217
> > [log in to unmask]
> >  
> > 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2