FACULTYTALK Archives

May 1994

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Bowal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Tue, 10 May 1994 19:49:28 MST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Text item: Re: testing.
 
  Marsha, you actually raise two new issues: the lack of ability of
  graduates to perform some of these important life skills and testing.  To
  the extent that the two are related, I feel that one of the great
  failures of Education researchers (you know, all those Ph.D's) is not to
  devise more effective methods to evaluate learning.
 
  For my part, I try to have testing simulate real life (eg. employment) as
  much as possible.  Therefore, no (oppressive) cramming for exams (open
  book or take home) and as much grade assigned to "class contribution" and
  even growth in knowledge and skills as possible (the idea being that this
  is a better approximation of how we are evaluated at work).  Of course,
  because it is different and unpredictable, students generally hate it.
  -  Peter  Bowal

ATOM RSS1 RSS2