FACULTYTALK Archives

March 2000

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Razook, Nim M" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:59:37 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I'm with John and John.  Nice idea, but not a priority.  nim razook

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Allison [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 1:36 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Code of ethics:
>
> At 10:40 AM 3/6/2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >i don't think that a code of ethics for our organization is something
> that
> >we should be spending a lot of time on... there are more important
> concerns
> >that should be addressed, such as the decline in tenure track
> appointments,
> >how to increase membership, how to save the law portion of the cpa exam
> >from erosion, what to do about weak accreditation standards, etc... we
> have
> >enough external threats to our discipline to address rather than spend
> our
> >time on deciding on a code of ethics for our organization... what would
> be
> >the purpose of such a code?... do we have a serious problem with
> unethical
> >business law professors?...
> >
> >john blackburn
> >
> I just want to voice my agreement with John B.
>
> John Allison

ATOM RSS1 RSS2