I disagree. I often do not quote myself. You say something. You say it  
again. You don't have to put it in quotes the second time. What you  
cannot do is submit the second rendition as new academic work; that  
would be fraud. But it is not plagiarism to say something twice. Else  
we'd all be in some remote ring of hell.

Else we'd all be in some remote ring of he'll.

Warm down here.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:47 PM, "Geyer, Leon" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Under our system, you have duty to turn it in and let the honor system
> apply the standards.  I think you have an ethical duty.  Our systems
> makes the determination of what is appropriate.  Not quoting ones self
> is not appropriate.
>
> Leon
>
>
> This is a serious case of academic misconduct for both undergrads and
> grads.  I would file charges and follow the procedures to ensure an  
> F in
> the course and a notation of academic dishonesty in the student's
> record.
> Laura
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sally Gunz
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:32 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Quick question
>
> Quick question for a colleague:
>
> A student is doing a research paper. Turnitin shows a huge overlap  
> with
> another paper -- that student's own other paper with no citation to  
> that
>
> paper.
>
> From your perspectives, what, if any, academic offences have been
> committed? Further, is it of any relevance that the students were not
> specifically told that they could not submit something that has  
> already
> been accepted for academic credit elsewhere? Please note, masters  
> level
> student.
>
> Sally