John -- reasons?

By the way, I should have mentioned, it would clearly be anonymous.

Sally

John Allison {allisonj} wrote:

>I think it's a bad idea.
>
>John
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of sgunz
>Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:45 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Question
>
>Quick question:
>
>When you review papers for journals, do you ever get a copy of the other
>
>reviewer(s) review? Do you have any thoughts on the rights and wrongs of
>
>this?
>
>I raise this issue as the Journal of Bus. Ethics has a file management 
>system and I didn't realise that it allows reviewers access to the other
>
>review and they are also sent it when the resubmit goes out. I hadn't 
>realised this happened and had one reviewer really angry about it. The 
>person at Springer was surprised by my request to change this. So I said
>
>I would ask around to see what others think. Comments?
>
>Sally
>
>
>  
>