FACULTYTALK Archives

July 2005

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:32:51 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (175 lines)
 

 

And I have, bon ami!

 

 

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

 

 Oswald, Lynda
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:43 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Oleanna

 

You are so right, but Souchet was absolutely perfect in the Poirot role --
it's a worthwhile series to obtain on DVD!

 

________________________________

 

From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk on behalf of Kenneth
Schneyer

Sent: Wed 7/27/2005 1:31 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Oleanna

 

 

 

Souchet played Hercule Poirot (the Agatha Christie character), not

Inspector Clouseau (the Pink Panther character).

 

Picking nits,

 

Ken

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk

[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of bruce d. fisher

Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 1:04 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Oleanna

 

I have seen the play twice in London--once about 10 years ago with David

 

Souchet miscast as the professor (recall he played Inspector Clousseau

(sp)

in public TV Mystery series) and was far too "mousey" to play the

prof.)and

a second time with a better, more plausible man cast as the prof--about

a

year or so ago, again in London.  The play is a study in power

relationships with a distinct reversal of power from dominant prof. over

 

student to dominant student over prof during the course of the

play.  Whether Mamet's depiction is accurate across the board is

questionable because the way he treats legal rights conferred on women

is

to implicitly say they can be perverted by opportunistic women.  In so

doing he seems to say a well intentioned law--protecting women from

sexual

harassment--can, in a given situation, lead to unintended results.  I

have

NEVER seen this play in the U.S.  Possibly a reason for this is the

skeptical view Europeans have in "naive Americans' attempt to rectify

every

wrong by passing a law.

                In terms of cases dealing with this topic, you might

want

to consider CJ Rehnquist's opinion in Meritor v. Vinson (1986) in which

one

of the most conservative SCt justices writes strongly in favor of women

who

raise sexual harassment claims.  Clearly, Rehnquist does NOT agree with

Mamet's "take" on the evils of conferring such rights on women.

                A provocative play, though.

                                    Bruce D. Fisher

At 11:46 AM 7/27/2005, you wrote:

>Hello everyone,

>I have been asked to participate on a panel to discuss the David Mamet

>play "Oleanna" as it relates to student faculty interaction.  Do you

>know of any specific materials that deal with that play in terms of

>sexual harassment law?

>Thanks.  See you in San Fran.

>rc

> 

>--

>Ronnie Cohen, J.D., LL.M.

>Professor of Business Law

>Christopher Newport University

>1 University Place

>Newport News, VA 23606

>757-594-7075

ATOM RSS1 RSS2