FACULTYTALK Archives

July 2014

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Highsmith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Sun, 20 Jul 2014 19:03:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Im not sure how civil RICO suits are handled after a RICO conviction, but they may be similar to the Sherman. And Clayton acts for treble damage civil actions. Thats an area yoi could also check.  JIM 
----- Original Message -----
From: Lynda Oswald &lt;[log in to unmask]&gt;
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:27:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: statutory strict liability question

I'm seeking some assistance from the collective wisdom of the Academy on a
research issue.

I am looking for examples of federal civil statutes that impose strict
liability. I can think of two examples on my own:  (1) direct patent
infringement under the Patent Act of 1952 is a strict liability; (2)
 CERCLA imposes strict liability upon owners and operators for cleanup of
hazardous waste. (In both of those examples, the strict liability standard
is not explicit in the statutory language but that's okay -- close enough
for my purposes).

Is anyone aware of other examples of strict liability in federal civil
statutes? I've seen literature on strict liability in the criminal statute
context, but can't find much written in the civil statutory context.

Thanks!

Lynda


-- 
Lynda J. Oswald
Area Chair and Professor of Business Law
University of Michigan
Stephen M. Ross School of Business
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2