FACULTYTALK Archives

December 2005

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Allison {allisonj} <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:48:51 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I think it's a bad idea.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of sgunz
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Question

Quick question:

When you review papers for journals, do you ever get a copy of the other

reviewer(s) review? Do you have any thoughts on the rights and wrongs of

this?

I raise this issue as the Journal of Bus. Ethics has a file management 
system and I didn't realise that it allows reviewers access to the other

review and they are also sent it when the resubmit goes out. I hadn't 
realised this happened and had one reviewer really angry about it. The 
person at Springer was surprised by my request to change this. So I said

I would ask around to see what others think. Comments?

Sally

ATOM RSS1 RSS2