Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk |
Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:46:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That would be the norm here (and it can lead to interesting decisions re
in which dept. the person ends up if the particular discipline doesn't
exist at the University eg engineer going to business). But our present
Director I believe did not want to go thru' that process and neither did
the previous one although that was a special circumstances as it was a
four year appointment running up to the person's desired retirement
date. I have never thought it to be a good thing -- first, to me it is a
sign of lack of respect by the school in an academic context, and
second, it seems to be a reflection of the person's own lack of
self-confidence as an academic (in this case the person is not an active
researcher). And I think it leads to too much unnecessary deference to
traditional researchers.
In sum, I would really push for administrators to have regular
appointments and if you have chosen the right people it should be a very
simple process.
Sally
Mary-Kathryn Zachary wrote:
> At our institution, administrators go through the regular review process.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Terence Lau <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 14, 2008 10:50 AM
> *Subject:* A question of academic values
>
>
> Colleagues,
>
> When your university appoints a senior-level administrator such as
> Chair or Dean, how does tenure review work? In other words, does
> the candidate or candidates put forward by the search committee go
> through the ordinary review process (whatever that may be), or is
> there an extraordinary review process for tenurability? I'm
> curious how our practice (candidate reviewed by Provost, not
> faculty) differs from other schools.
>
>
>
> _____
> Terence Lau
> Assistant Professor, Business Law
> Management and Marketing Department
> University of Dayton_
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Spam <http://canit.westga.edu/b.php?i=21734569&m=c1efce21e8a1&c=s>
> Not spam <http://canit.westga.edu/b.php?i=21734569&m=c1efce21e8a1&c=n>
> Forget previous vote
> <http://canit.westga.edu/b.php?i=21734569&m=c1efce21e8a1&c=f>
>
|
|
|