FACULTYTALK Archives

April 2001

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
SALLY GUNZ <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:52:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Thanks to my dear colleague who points out the obvious Freudian slip --
undoubtedly it is both a daft and draft response. Like, folks, it was me
who"dafted" it!!

Yours in proof reading

Sally

SALLY GUNZ wrote:

> I want to bring you up to date on how we are proceeding. I am now
> finalising a daft response to the AICPA Position Paper that I will
> circulate first to a small group of you and then to the group as a
> whole. Once we are all satisfied with this, it will be submitted to the
> AICPA.
>
> I will also prepare, based on our response, briefing materials on the
> ALSB position re this Exposure Draft. These are for those of you who are
> to lobby the State Boards. It is essential, however, that we have
> someone for each state volunteer. As of today, I only have volunteers
> for the following states.
>
> Arkansas
> California
> Delaware
> Florida
> Indiana:
> Iowa
> Kansas
> Louisiana
> Michigan
> Minnesota
> Nevada
> New Mexico
> North Dakota
> Ohio
> Pennsylvania
> South Dakota
> Virginia
> Wisconsin
>
> We have been told that our ability to reach the State Boards will be
> critical and I would urge you to please sign up to do this if you notice
> your state isn't listed. I want to make it clear that the news re the
> exam is not dire. However, we want to make sure our imput is effective
> and that the coverage is the most appropriate.
>
> Finally, I want to prepare (with the assistance of others) a kit to be
> distributed to all Schools that update people re the changes to the
> examination coverage. This seems to me to be critical as there are
> undoubtedly still some out there who think that there has been a major
> reduction, and we need to sell ourselves anyway. I believe it is most
> appropriate to wait until the structure and content specifications are
> finalized, but I would like your advice on this. Again, I will also need
> your assistance with responses to drafts etc.
>
> I thank you all for the help you have given to date and I know will
> continue to give. This is a pain I realise, but it is also very
> important and worth doing well.
>
> Sally Gunz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2