FACULTYTALK Archives

February 2001

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Frank Cross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:59:04 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Etiquette won't solve the problem.  These viruses are not sent purposefully
to the list.  They are opened inadvertently, and then the virus sends
itself to the list.  Computer gurus -- is there some technical fix where
the listserver would simply decline to send attachments with certain suffixes?


At 08:33 AM 2/13/2001 -0500, sgunz wrote:
>Ken S was correct. The email that came around re the tennis player Anna
>?? was apparently a virus. If I understood the CBC news correctly, it
>doesn't sound like it harms the hard drive but it is a real nuisance.
>
>I realise the following is not any guarantee of successful prevention,
>but is there any point in establishing some sort of etiquette on
>alsbtalk re sending emails with attachments -- would it work to make
>sure you start off with a clear explanation that this is you sending the
>email. Maybe have a message and then the follow up second email with the
>attachment. Something to verify this is not a computer virus generated
>message? Anyone have any suggestions? The trouble is, right now the only
>safeguard is not to open anything. Other groups must have systems. What
>works at least somewhat?
>
>Sally
>
Frank Cross
Herbert D. Kelleher Centennial Professor of Business Law
CBA 5.202
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712

ATOM RSS1 RSS2