I have similar thoughts.

________________________________

From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk on behalf of David W. Opderbeck
Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 10:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Biden and Kennedy



Nothing that's appropriate for a family listserv.

David W. Opderbeck
Assistant Professor of Business Law
Baruch College, City University of New York
(646) 312-3602
[log in to unmask]


Richard Hurley <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: "Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk" <[log in to unmask]>
09/16/2005 10:27 AM AST
Please respond to "Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk"

To: [log in to unmask]
cc: 
bcc: 
Subject: Re: Biden and Kennedy
 



I am looking for a word that describes Ted Kennedy being on the ethics committee - any help?

Rich H

________________________________

From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk on behalf of Zupanc, Thomas
Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 10:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Biden and Kennedy



Unfortunately, Dan is correct.

TZ

-----Original Message-----
From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan Levin
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 1:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Biden and Kennedy

>Tom Zupanc writes:
>
>"...BTW, having Biden and Kennedy vote on someone else's ethical values
is
>laughable if it were not so tragic."

In my view, having Joe Biden and Ted Kennedy evaluate a Supreme Court
nominee's ethical values is neither laughable nor tragic.  I don't
buy the argument that Biden's or Kennedy's ethical flaws are
significantly more serious than the ethical flaws of numerous members
of the US Senate or the US government generally, including President
GW Bush.

Dan Levin