Follow up to my comment re RIM.

There was a long story in the Globe and Mail about Rim's troubles and it 
talked about a pivotal event in the initial litigation where the Rim 
lawyer had an expert demonstrate how some software had existed long 
before the plaintiff claimed to have made his invention. However, 
apparently they fudged the demo by using current software and got caught 
out and this was highly influential in turning jury and judge against Rim.

Does anyone have more details on this?

Sally