Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:41:31 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As others have observed, the irony is that the threatened action
would violate the Kelo standard, insofar as it is a deliberate attempt
to rob Peter (David) to pay Paul. Legal satire is tricky!
-----Original Message-----
From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael O'Hara
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: cute/interesting
A just dessert, especially if ironic, is my favorite
dessert.
However, am I the only one who read that press release and
wondered
what was the law on threatening a judge and how broad would be
the defense
of free speech when wrapped in a petition of government?
Michael
Professor Michael J. O'Hara, J.D., Ph.D.
Finance, Banking, & Law Department Editor, Journal of
Legal
Economics
College of Business Administration (402) 554 - 2014 voice
fax (402)
554 - 3825
Roskens Hall 502 www.AAEFE.org
University of Nebraska at Omaha
www.JournalOfLegalEconomics.com
Omaha NE 68182
[log in to unmask]
(402) 554 - 2823 voice fax (402) 554 - 2680
http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/mohara/web/ohara.htm
|
|
|