Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk |
Date: | Tue, 14 Nov 1995 10:57:34 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 14:01:03 -0600
From: Annette Berger <[log in to unmask]>
To: Multiple recipients of list IABS-L <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re[2]: affirmative action
Can't help joining the fray on this one. Someone recently
asked me if I didn't feel like a token female at jobs I had
in the mainframe computer industry beginning in the late
70s. I replied that yes, perhaps I was but I was not hired
into entry-level positions without being qualified. In the
past they simply would not have let me in. Once I was in, I
had the opportunity to gain experience and build a track
record that exclusion would not have permitted. I say
so what if one is a token? Very rarely does it have to
do with qualifications. (For that matter, rarely are men
hired just based on qualifications. Even as I was being a
"token" I saw less qualified white men given similar
opportunities. And, being let in had nothing to do with
whether or not I faced discrimination on the job through
benign neglect or worse!) As a high school grad in the top
1% of my class,, I was not allowed to apply for jobs in the
old days where they hired men who didn't even graduate.
Give me a break!! There needs to be some serious research
on this difference between perceptions and reality. Maybe
someone can point us in the direction of some work???
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|