What a subtle debate is being developed here - between the sharing
community that is (no?) the very reason for the existence of the Academy
and the trembling fear of theft!
I think I'd be more worried about the mindset of anyone who wanted to nick
my stuff!!!
hey ho
autumn draws on - trousers too.
Peter
___________________
Peter Shears
Director of Professional Studies
Department of Accountancy & Law
Plymouth Business School
University of Plymouth
Drake Circus
Plymouth
PL4 8AA
England
Tel 01752 23 28 22 (desk)
Tel 01752 23 28 55 (message)
Fax 01752 23 28 53
INTERNET (MIME accepted): [log in to unmask]
PAGER: numbers or up to about 15 words: 04325 382541
Frank Cross
<[log in to unmask] To: [log in to unmask]
EDU> cc:
Sent by: "Academy of Subject: Re: papers, diskettes
Legal Studies in
Business (ALSB)
Talk"
<[log in to unmask]
UOHIO.EDU>
02/10/00 02:04
Please respond to
"Academy of Legal
Studies in Business
(ALSB) Talk"
Sounds good to me Ginnie.
I'm a little concerned about the plagiarism concern. Unless somebody's
got actual knowledge of it's occurrence, I don't think the assertion
should be mentioned. If they do have actual knowledge, I think it's fair
to provide specifics. I find it highly unlikely that this is a legitimate
concern.
At 06:49 PM 10/2/2000 EST, you wrote:
>Hi list --
>
>Many thanks for all these reactions and ideas.
>
>Here's my [as usual] long-winded set of thoughts, which as program
>chair I guess I'll implement unless between now and then a better
>idea comes along or the executive committee really doesn't like it.
>
>My inclination is continue the requirement that at least some number
>of hard copies be brought to the paper session because I think
>some substantial part of our membership expects to touch and feel
>hard copy when they hear a paper. It is also a sort of a "statute of
>frauds" - like thing -- maintaining a high quality of papers was a
>major major concern in the membership survey, and I wonder about
>the effects of not needing to produce a hard copy at all would have
>on quality, since we do not require advance submission of the paper
>in most cases but referee from the abstract.
>
>The rest of my inclination -- at least as a first departure from
>tradition -- is to let the paper presenter decide how to handle extra
>copies beyond X required number of hard copies (5? 10?). The
>presenter could keep bringing 25 hard copies or bring X hard
>copies + 25 - X diskette versions. Maybe someday we'll be able to
>install airports and just zap them to the audience's laptops as we
>speak, so to speak. [aside: Our son has installed an airport in our
>house; the DSL line will be installed Thursday; wireless high speed
>internet service from anywhere in the house and the yard, including
>under the magnolias. Does everybody else already have this and I
>am just behind the times, as usual, or is this cool ???]
>
>A table for sale of papers idea would be attractive if we had the
>person power to do it. It would make it a little harder to obtain a copy
>of a paper one has seen presented. And, alas, we might be throwing
>out more paper than we do now.
>
>The web site poses some issues like the one Royce raised. Having
>the proceedings on the web would not pose those problems. Maybe
>it is on the web. Maybe I ought to know. Help, Dan.
>
>The common computer scenario raises virus issues, I am told. We
>had thought that seemed like an excellent solution.
>
>I'm a little surprised by the plagiarism concerns, too. Another reason
>for omitting footnotes (which I have done) is to keep the length and
>weight reasonable, and footnotes shouldn't be all that important to
>the casual reader at a meeting. Those concerned about having their
>footnotes napstered (see, it's a verb now -- I napster, you napster,
>he napsters, we napster, ya'll napster, they napster) can do text-only
>electronic versions.
>
>Will this model be acceptable to the membership?
>
>Ginny
>
Frank Cross
Herbert D. Kelleher Centennial Professor of Business Law
CBA 5.202
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712
|
