Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:26:27 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi cris,
That sounds like good news; maybe you and I can chat sometime soon so
that I'll be able to understand how this works in a bit more detail.
Best,
Patrick
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:20 AM, cheek, cris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i spoke with Joe Carlin last evening about the snafu with our cap and I
> think it's going to be easily resolved. Joe's position, and i take it the
> position of the curriculum committee that he chairs, was that a cap would be
> a bear to operate.
>
> I spoke with Patrick Murphy along similar lines yesterday afternoon and he
> agrees. It seems that the best mechanism is to work with the registrar's
> office on patterns of enrollment, using datelines at which different batches
> of students can enroll. We can make Minors wait, in some instances, until
> later in the cycle. That way we will not make life more difficult for
> Majors.
>
> We'll get it up and running and monitor enrollment in what is likely to be a
> popular Minor for the first couple of years using that mechanism.
>
> Thanks,
>
> cris
|
|
|