Certainly true that secondary fields were not much (if at all) discussed.
I have no issue or problem with redoing secondary fields in the fullness
of time, as this process moves forward.  Certainly did not intend to
circumscribe much except the circumscription of time and the need to have
something in place.

On 11/16/11 11:32 PM, "Cheek, Christopher F. Dr." <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>i appreciate the work put into the Creative non-fiction hire . . but feel
>strongly that the "preferred secondary fields" were not discussed - at
>least in that limited formulation. I don't have trouble with those fields
>being listed but they needed to be added to. Otherwise the potential
>field of creative non-fiction is being far too circumscribed.
>
>
>cris
>
>
>
>On Nov 16, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Goodman, Eric wrote:
>
>> Consider it disregarded, Captain.
>> 
>> On 11/16/11 5:02 PM, "Luongo, Margaret M. Ms." <[log in to unmask]>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>> Oh, I see--disregard my other email.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Margaret Luongo
>>> Associate Professor, Creative Writing
>>> Department of English
>>> 356 Bachelor Hall
>>> Oxford, OH 45056
>>> 513-529-5221
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Miami University Creative Writing Faculty
>>> [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goodman, Eric
>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:33 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Tenure Track Hire in Creative Nonfiction
>>> 
>>> Dear Writers,
>>> 
>>> Here is the proposal, which I've just sent to Debbie.  I've been
>>>working
>>> on it all day.  I apologize for not giving you time to respond/amend,
>>>but
>>> we're way past the deadline.  I  IMAGINE  there will be time to
>>> respond/amend before it goes to the dean, since she hasn't asked for
>>> these requests until December 12th.
>>> 
>>>   E