I didn't make stylistic edits, but offered some quick feedback in the doc (attached). I've been somewhat outside the conversations on this event, and that may explain why I'm still a little unclear on its focus/purpose, so take my comments for what they're worth. Regardless, I think the PR should be as explicit (and taut) as possible in conveying the purpose of the event and exactly what kinds of panels/submissions everyone's hoping for. Else, who knows what dross might arrive in your inboxes.

Eric M



-----Original Message-----
From: Miami University Creative Writing Faculty [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tuma, Keith W.
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 4:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Taut : short forms cfp for AWP

I've made a few additional changes and tried to address Margaret's editorial asides. Keith

On 2/22/12 4:32 PM, "Luongo, Margaret M. Ms." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Hey, cris--
>
>I think the design looks good--not plain at all! I made some editorial 
>suggestions to the copy on the reverse--see attached.
>
>Thanks for doing this.
>
>--Margaret