This looks good to me. Thanks cris and Margaret. One tiny thing, in
the first paragraph under "Notes," "In general" appears twice.

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, cheek, cris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> HI all,
>
> here's the revised document. Have a look. I hesitated to take a vote today
> and perhaps ought to have done so. But my sense is that the decision to
> stake our pitch on a revision based upon 39 hours is unanimous? Can i say
> that?
>
> DO please have a look at this revision, which Margaret has turned around on
> the spin of a coin. Thanks to her for doing that!
>
> IF there are further comments before i pass it on to Lu for the department
> meeting next week could you share them here on the list before tomorrow
> midnight.
>
> I would then send them to Lu first thing Friday morning.
>
> fwiw I feel that the principle are right, and we might be able to finesse
> our compromise before doing the bigger paperwork. It would though be great
> to have our document in play as par of net week's department meeting.
>
>
> cris