MUCWFAC Archives

March 2011

MUCWFAC@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Schloss, David Mr." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Miami University Creative Writing Faculty <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:16:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Dear Eric,

Quite ok with me. A bit redundant, but the form demands that. Spacing of one line in Outcomes 1a could be corrected. 
I have no quibbles with the content of any of these answers--unless there's a problem of being held accountable for specifics. In that case, somehow more general and vague on outcomes? Still a mite wordy in Practical Criticism outcomes, in any case. The creative part in A is quite generalized. B on criticism may be too specific?

Of course, this document is an example of how NOT to do creative writing, but I can see the shaping labor you put into it and thank you for the effective efforts.

David

________________________________________
From: Miami University Creative Writing Faculty [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goodman, Eric [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Competency and Assessment Document

Dear Writers,

    Here’s the beast.   Comments?

   EKG

ATOM RSS1 RSS2