In effect, we already do divide our money that way, trying to keep X dollars
in reserve to spend as the year goes on.



On 6/21/11 7:28 AM, "Cheek, Christopher F. Dr." <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> i think we could think about dividing our pots of money into chunks for the
> more long-term planned and for the more on-the-spur-of-the moment
> 
> planned schedule and opportunity schedule
> 
> not at all thinking of them as the big readers with big names and the lesser /
> emergent names although those distinctions might be humming along in the
> background
> 
> 
> cris
> 
> 
> On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Luongo, Margaret M. Ms. wrote:
> 
>> This guy should definitely come. About the secondary readings--I'd be afraid
>> not many people would come. However, I'm willing to try.
>> 
>> --M
>> 
>> 
>> Margaret Luongo
>> Associate Professor, Creative Writing
>> Department of English
>> 356 Bachelor Hall
>> Oxford, OH 45056
>> 513-529-5221
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Miami University Creative Writing Faculty [[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Cathy Wagner [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 5:13 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Nick Demske
>> 
>> We could, and probably should. I would like this guy to come though. I think
>> the idea cris and David floated about having a secondary reading series is a
>> good one. You don't have to come! Or you can just come to the party after and
>> pretend you did. I would support that, and provide you a beverage.
>> 
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Luongo, Margaret M. Ms.
>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>> Or we could just schedule fewer readings?