I am wondering about a separate category for Canadians? What do other
Canadians think? Are there enough of us to make it worth while (and us not
obviously identifiable)? Is it relevant to combine as a separate category with
Australians, NZers and UK or would that be misleading?

Sally

"Virginia Maurer (MAN)" wrote:

> Dan, I think it is a good idea. Categorize it in terms of numbers of
> fulltime tenure-track faculty and also in terms of school rankings.
>
> Ginny
>
> Date sent:              Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:21:59 -0500
> Send reply to:          "Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk"
>                 <[log in to unmask]>
> From:                   DANIEL HERRON <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject:                Re: Salary Data/Survey
> To:                     [log in to unmask]
>
> No...that hasn't changed.....but my concern is that data is being
> someway different for schools with a strong b-law presence and
> active
> members (i.e. ALSB members) vis schools with a wekaer
> presence....if
> we can create a subset of the AACSB data, it might be to our
> advantage...then again.....
>
> Dan
>
> >>> [log in to unmask] 03/16/01 12:01 PM >>>
> I thought that they used to report the business law profession
> separately. Have they changed that?