ATEG Archives

May 2001

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
shun Tang <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 19 May 2001 00:07:23 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
> An aspect of verb and tense that interests me is the contrast between.....

My reply: Yes, sometimes I, too, want to find something interesting between
verb and tense. It is because the fact is so cruel we cannot face it any
more.

Shun
englishtense.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Haussamen, Brock" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:23 PM
Subject: Verbs, tense, and existence


> An aspect of verb and tense that interests me is the contrast between how
> nouns are noncommittal about the existence of things and verbs and their
> adverbial additions do the job of affirming existence and placing it in
> time.
>
> Nouns imply that the thing they name exists but they do so vaguely. Nouns
> are marked for many things, but whether the entity is real or fictional,
> alive or dead, now or not-now, is not one of them.  This is also true for
> proper nouns such as a person's name.  A name implies the existence of the
> person but carries no information about whether the person is living.
>
> Verbs are all about time-consciousness-- not just past and present, but
> complete, incomplete, relevant, etc.  Verbs assert existence strongly,
even
> when it was in the past.  _To be_, some have said, is the fundamental verb
> in any language.
>
> The reason this all interests me is that I think it plays a role in the
> human religious tendency to believe in an afterlife.  Our desire for the
> dead to go on living is not contradicted by our syntax.  The name of the
> person remains unchanged from what it was when they lived.  Even a
sentence
> such as "John died" presents him as the same syntactic source of action
that
> he always was.  The verb asserts a condition in time, of course, so the
> message is mixed; the predicate tells us about JOhn's changed status in
> time.  "John is gone."  But even that is in the present tense--and an easy
> message to transcend not only because we may want to but because the name
> remains the same.
>
>
> Brock Haussamen
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
at:
>      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2