Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 21 May 2001 20:37:53 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In your examples, "despite" seems to be a preposition with gerund phrases
for objects.
> ----------
> From: Richard Veit, UNCW English Department
> Reply To: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:48 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Fwd: Re: Verb aspect and ellipsis
>
> >From: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Re: Verb aspect and ellipsis
> >
> >Elliptical clauses come from "be-deletion" and if there is no form of the
> >verb "to be"
> >in the underlying clause, there's nothing to (ahem!) 'ellipt.'
>
> How then do we account for the following sentences?
>
> (1) She raised three children despite working two jobs.
> (2) She raised three children despite having worked two jobs.
>
> There do not seem to be corresponding sentences with underlying "to be":
>
> (3) *She raised three children despite she was working two jobs.
> (4) *She raised three children despite she was having worked two jobs.
>
> Dick Veit
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
> at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|