FACULTYTALK Archives

May 2005

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Shaw <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Wed, 18 May 2005 13:10:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Sally, It has something to do with one-upmansship.  Keep science and
social science in its place.  Bevo

ps  Brace yourself for the rebuttals (send them to Sally).

===========

>OK -- I know I'm going to start a fight. But can anyone please advise
>when law writers elected to write academic articles without
>bibliographies and why?  Please note, I am not commenting on the
>absolutely ridiculous number of footnotes (tho' my frustration re
>bibliographies or lack thereof has something to do with reading 300 plus
>endnotes in a crappy article to try to determine whether certain
>articles were cited.)
>
>Sally

ATOM RSS1 RSS2