Cal,

It would be better if you could make the requests officially through TAC
as a bug fix/enhancement.  Unfortunately, I am not the right conduit for
Airespace info and these requests might not be tracked properly if you
did not convey them into TAC.

Regards,
-Rajesh. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cal Frye
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Airespace list?

OK, I understand. It would be nice for the Airespace controller to
accept lease times greater than 65535 seconds, too. We currently use
864000, for address stability... Otherwise, I'll be patient and wait and
see what comes. Thanks for the clear reply.

--Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
   www.ouuf.org, www.calfrye.com
   Say Yes Twice for Oberlin Schools!   www.oberlinyesyes.com

  "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge."
--Charles Darwin.


Rajesh Nair (rajnair) wrote:
> When Airespace controllers are working in L2/bridging mode, instead of

> forwarding DHCP requests, they "relay" DHCP requests.  This is 
> behavior contrary to RFC specs and the CCA/Perfigo DHCP server rejects

> these requests because it does not expect to see relayed packets 
> within its broadcast domain.